+313.3%
ANET vs MCK
+112.3%
+200.9%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MCK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.6% | +0.1% | +5.5% | +5.6% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -2.9% | +5.9% | +2.8% |
| 30D | -5.2% | +0.4% | -5.6% | -5.2% |
| 3M | +27.6% | +12.1% | +15.5% | +28.8% |
| 6M | +44.4% | -5.4% | +49.8% | +44.2% |
| YTD | +52.3% | +7.8% | +44.5% | +53.9% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | +22.9% | +7.5% | +33.6% |
| 3Y | +313.3% | +110.7% | +202.5% | +300.9% |
| All | +313.3% | +112.3% | +200.9% | +300.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MCK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MCK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MCK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MCK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling