+30.4%
ANET vs LULU
-39.6%
+70.1%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LULU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.6% | +2.2% | +3.5% | +5.4% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -1.6% | +4.6% | +3.1% |
| 30D | -5.2% | -18.1% | +12.9% | -4.1% |
| 3M | +27.6% | -18.8% | +46.4% | +29.5% |
| 6M | +44.4% | -39.2% | +83.6% | +55.6% |
| YTD | +52.3% | -52.4% | +104.7% | +67.8% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | -40.3% | +70.7% | +40.1% |
| All | +30.4% | -39.6% | +70.1% | +40.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LULU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LULU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LULU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LULU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling