+37.3%
ANET vs LULU
-49.9%
+87.2%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LULU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | -17.4% | +18.6% | +2.0% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -16.7% | +15.9% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -1.8% | -18.5% | +16.8% | -1.0% |
| 3M | +16.7% | -19.5% | +36.2% | +18.5% |
| 6M | +43.7% | -41.9% | +85.6% | +51.9% |
| YTD | +47.9% | -51.6% | +99.5% | +56.8% |
| 1Y | +37.3% | -51.2% | +88.4% | +46.6% |
| All | +37.3% | -49.9% | +87.2% | +46.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LULU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LULU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LULU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LULU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling