+25.4%
ANET vs LSCC
+72.6%
-47.2%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | -1.1% | -0.9% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -1.3% | +0.4% | -1.7% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -4.5% | -9.5% | +5.0% | -0.7% |
| 3M | +24.5% | -13.8% | +38.3% | +31.2% |
| 6M | +35.4% | +24.5% | +10.9% | +25.4% |
| YTD | +44.2% | +55.1% | -10.9% | +21.9% |
| 1Y | +25.4% | +72.5% | -47.1% | -0.8% |
| All | +25.4% | +72.6% | -47.2% | -0.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling