+743.9%
ANET vs LCID
-97.9%
+841.9%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | -2.1% | +0.1% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -9.1% | +7.9% | -0.3% |
| 30D | -4.5% | -37.6% | +33.1% | +0.2% |
| 3M | +24.5% | -11.1% | +35.6% | +23.0% |
| 6M | +35.4% | -59.2% | +94.5% | +45.8% |
| YTD | +44.2% | -60.5% | +104.7% | +55.1% |
| 1Y | +25.4% | -78.5% | +103.9% | +43.7% |
| 3Y | +284.8% | -92.8% | +377.6% | +371.8% |
| All | +743.9% | -97.9% | +841.9% | +1,122.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling