+30.4%
ANET vs KRMN
-43.1%
+73.5%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.6% | +2.6% | +3.0% | +5.1% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -11.8% | +14.8% | +5.4% |
| 30D | -5.2% | -43.0% | +37.8% | +5.6% |
| 3M | +27.6% | -28.8% | +56.5% | +34.6% |
| 6M | +44.4% | -66.3% | +110.7% | +80.6% |
| YTD | +52.3% | -51.8% | +104.1% | +70.0% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | -44.7% | +75.1% | +47.7% |
| All | +30.4% | -43.1% | +73.5% | +47.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling