+299.5%
ANET vs INTU
-41.7%
+341.1%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | INTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -1.6% | +0.5% | -0.7% |
| 7D | +3.7% | -8.5% | +12.1% | +5.4% |
| 30D | +0.7% | -6.1% | +6.9% | +1.6% |
| 3M | +26.8% | +7.3% | +19.5% | +23.0% |
| 6M | +40.7% | -33.2% | +73.9% | +57.3% |
| YTD | +47.2% | -52.2% | +99.4% | +93.2% |
| 1Y | +36.0% | -52.7% | +88.6% | +78.5% |
| All | +299.5% | -41.7% | +341.1% | +346.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside INTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus INTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × INTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded INTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling