+299.5%
ANET vs ILMN
+32.3%
+267.2%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ILMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -2.9% | +1.8% | -0.5% |
| 7D | +3.7% | -3.9% | +7.5% | +4.4% |
| 30D | +0.7% | +6.9% | -6.2% | -0.6% |
| 3M | +26.8% | +28.1% | -1.3% | +20.8% |
| 6M | +40.7% | +65.0% | -24.3% | +27.6% |
| YTD | +47.2% | +56.3% | -9.1% | +34.5% |
| 1Y | +36.0% | +108.7% | -72.8% | +16.6% |
| All | +299.5% | +32.3% | +267.2% | +278.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ILMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ILMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ILMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ILMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling