+209.8%
ANET vs IBIT
+58.9%
+150.9%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | IBIT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | -1.9% | +2.5% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +3.0% | +1.4% | +1.6% | +2.6% |
| 30D | +3.3% | +20.6% | -17.3% | -2.1% |
| 3M | +24.7% | +23.7% | +1.0% | +17.2% |
| 6M | +46.7% | +15.0% | +31.7% | +40.3% |
| YTD | +48.8% | -10.6% | +59.4% | +50.6% |
| 1Y | +39.2% | -30.3% | +69.6% | +49.2% |
| All | +209.8% | +58.9% | +150.9% | +176.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IBIT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IBIT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IBIT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IBIT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling