+291.3%
ANET vs HUT
+716.2%
-424.9%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HUT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | -5.5% | +3.5% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -1.3% | +2.8% | -4.1% | -1.8% |
| 30D | -4.5% | +2.1% | -6.5% | -5.3% |
| 3M | +24.5% | -14.3% | +38.8% | +25.9% |
| 6M | +35.4% | +84.2% | -48.9% | +16.9% |
| YTD | +44.2% | +97.2% | -53.0% | +21.5% |
| 1Y | +25.4% | +192.7% | -167.3% | -4.3% |
| All | +291.3% | +716.2% | -424.9% | +145.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HUT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HUT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HUT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HUT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling