+51.4%
ANET vs HTZ
-75.7%
+127.1%
-26.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | -2.6% | -1.9% | -4.4% |
| 7D | +15.5% | -8.5% | +24.0% | +16.1% |
| 30D | +1.0% | -18.9% | +19.9% | +2.5% |
| 3M | -3.1% | -36.0% | +32.9% | -1.1% |
| 6M | +40.2% | -74.6% | +114.8% | +48.8% |
| YTD | +50.6% | -70.8% | +121.4% | +54.8% |
| 1Y | +51.4% | -75.3% | +126.7% | +59.3% |
| All | +51.4% | -75.7% | +127.1% | +59.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling