+44.2%
ANET vs GLDM
-15.8%
+59.9%
-26.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.3% | -1.2% | +7.5% | +7.0% |
| 7D | +10.2% | -2.0% | +12.2% | +11.4% |
| 30D | -6.7% | -4.4% | -2.3% | -4.2% |
| 3M | -0.6% | -8.8% | +8.3% | +4.6% |
| 6M | +44.2% | -15.9% | +60.0% | +68.9% |
| All | +44.2% | -15.8% | +59.9% | +68.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling