+684.6%
ANET vs FLNC
-70.4%
+754.9%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.6% | +2.5% | +3.1% | +5.3% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -4.1% | +7.1% | +3.5% |
| 30D | -5.2% | -24.8% | +19.6% | -1.7% |
| 3M | +27.6% | -59.1% | +86.7% | +42.5% |
| 6M | +44.4% | -42.0% | +86.4% | +48.9% |
| YTD | +52.3% | -49.8% | +102.1% | +57.8% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | +43.1% | -12.7% | +12.9% |
| 3Y | +313.3% | -61.0% | +374.2% | +284.2% |
| All | +684.6% | -70.4% | +754.9% | +527.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling