+16.2%
ANET vs FLNC
-69.0%
+85.2%
-24.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.0% | +10.2% | -5.1% | +3.5% |
| 7D | -4.4% | -2.1% | -2.3% | -4.2% |
| 30D | -13.7% | -20.8% | +7.0% | -11.0% |
| 3M | -6.3% | -61.3% | +55.0% | +5.8% |
| 6M | +3.4% | -50.9% | +54.2% | +9.0% |
| YTD | +36.2% | -69.4% | +105.6% | +51.9% |
| 1Y | +16.2% | -68.4% | +84.6% | +28.7% |
| All | +16.2% | -69.0% | +85.2% | +28.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling