+313.3%
ANET vs FITB
+130.4%
+182.8%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FITB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.6% | +0.5% | +5.1% | +5.5% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -0.3% | +3.3% | +3.1% |
| 30D | -5.2% | -5.7% | +0.5% | -3.5% |
| 3M | +27.6% | +3.2% | +24.5% | +26.2% |
| 6M | +44.4% | +23.4% | +21.0% | +34.7% |
| YTD | +52.3% | +18.8% | +33.5% | +42.4% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | +25.0% | +5.4% | +19.4% |
| 3Y | +313.3% | +131.2% | +182.1% | +244.2% |
| All | +313.3% | +130.4% | +182.8% | +244.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FITB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FITB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FITB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FITB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling