+299.5%
ANET vs FGI
-1.2%
+300.7%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FGI | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | +2.4% | -3.4% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +3.7% | +14.7% | -11.0% | +3.7% |
| 30D | +0.7% | +67.0% | -66.2% | +0.8% |
| 3M | +26.8% | +31.0% | -4.2% | +27.0% |
| 6M | +40.7% | +126.8% | -86.2% | +40.2% |
| YTD | +47.2% | +35.6% | +11.6% | +47.0% |
| 1Y | +36.0% | +108.9% | -73.0% | +36.7% |
| All | +299.5% | -1.2% | +300.7% | +302.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FGI.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FGI return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FGI return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FGI wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling