+275.3%
ANET vs EPAM
-30.1%
+305.4%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | -0.4% | -4.1% | -4.5% |
| 7D | +15.5% | +2.4% | +13.1% | +15.4% |
| 30D | +1.0% | +42.3% | -41.4% | -2.6% |
| 3M | -3.1% | +60.7% | -63.8% | -8.4% |
| 6M | +40.2% | +80.5% | -40.3% | +28.7% |
| YTD | +50.6% | -20.4% | +70.9% | +63.3% |
| 1Y | +51.4% | -9.6% | +61.0% | +59.4% |
| 3Y | +275.3% | -30.5% | +305.8% | +299.4% |
| All | +275.3% | -30.1% | +305.4% | +299.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling