+299.5%
ANET vs EPAM
-57.0%
+356.5%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -0.5% | -0.5% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +3.7% | -2.2% | +5.8% | +4.0% |
| 30D | +0.7% | +17.8% | -17.0% | -1.8% |
| 3M | +26.8% | +19.9% | +6.9% | +22.4% |
| 6M | +40.7% | -21.6% | +62.2% | +48.5% |
| YTD | +47.2% | -44.0% | +91.3% | +66.4% |
| 1Y | +36.0% | -30.5% | +66.5% | +45.1% |
| All | +299.5% | -57.0% | +356.5% | +348.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling