+313.3%
ANET vs ENPH
-70.3%
+383.5%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENPH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.6% | -1.4% | +7.0% | +5.7% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -0.1% | +3.1% | +3.0% |
| 30D | -5.2% | -10.8% | +5.7% | -4.4% |
| 3M | +27.6% | -33.8% | +61.4% | +30.8% |
| 6M | +44.4% | -16.1% | +60.5% | +46.0% |
| YTD | +52.3% | +13.4% | +38.9% | +51.6% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | -2.6% | +33.0% | +30.5% |
| 3Y | +313.3% | -70.3% | +383.5% | +342.6% |
| All | +313.3% | -70.3% | +383.5% | +342.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENPH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENPH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENPH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENPH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling