+313.3%
ANET vs EBAY
+159.1%
+154.1%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EBAY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.6% | +2.6% | +3.0% | +5.2% |
| 7D | +3.0% | +4.2% | -1.2% | +2.4% |
| 30D | -5.2% | +5.6% | -10.8% | -6.1% |
| 3M | +27.6% | -1.4% | +29.0% | +27.5% |
| 6M | +44.4% | +18.2% | +26.2% | +37.7% |
| YTD | +52.3% | +24.8% | +27.5% | +43.8% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | +18.0% | +12.4% | +23.9% |
| 3Y | +313.3% | +160.3% | +153.0% | +216.6% |
| All | +313.3% | +159.1% | +154.1% | +216.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EBAY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EBAY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EBAY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EBAY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling