+109.7%
ANET vs CRCL
+31.3%
+78.4%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | CRCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.6% | +0.3% | +5.3% | +5.6% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -11.2% | +14.2% | +4.0% |
| 30D | -5.2% | +27.1% | -32.3% | -7.2% |
| 3M | +27.6% | +9.6% | +18.0% | +25.8% |
| 6M | +44.4% | -19.7% | +64.1% | +44.0% |
| YTD | +52.3% | +14.2% | +38.1% | +45.7% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | -32.2% | +62.7% | +27.8% |
| All | +109.7% | +31.3% | +78.4% | +108.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CRCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CRCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CRCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CRCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling