+44.4%
ANET vs CHTR
-33.5%
+77.9%
-23.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | CHTR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.6% | +3.7% | +1.9% | +5.9% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -4.1% | +7.1% | +2.7% |
| 30D | -5.2% | -3.0% | -2.2% | -5.2% |
| 3M | +27.6% | +4.8% | +22.9% | +29.1% |
| 6M | +44.4% | -35.0% | +79.4% | +43.0% |
| All | +44.4% | -33.5% | +77.9% | +43.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CHTR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CHTR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CHTR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CHTR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling