+313.3%
ANET vs BTI
+109.4%
+203.9%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BTI | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.6% | +0.7% | +4.9% | +5.7% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -0.2% | +3.2% | +3.0% |
| 30D | -5.2% | -1.1% | -4.1% | -5.2% |
| 3M | +27.6% | -8.8% | +36.4% | +26.9% |
| 6M | +44.4% | -4.0% | +48.3% | +43.8% |
| YTD | +52.3% | +0.4% | +52.0% | +51.6% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | +1.9% | +28.5% | +30.3% |
| 3Y | +313.3% | +108.5% | +204.7% | +291.8% |
| All | +313.3% | +109.4% | +203.9% | +291.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BTI.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BTI return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BTI return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BTI wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling