+313.3%
ANET vs BLDR
-57.1%
+370.3%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.6% | +2.4% | +3.2% | +5.2% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -8.2% | +11.2% | +4.4% |
| 30D | -5.2% | -16.6% | +11.4% | -2.5% |
| 3M | +27.6% | -23.2% | +50.8% | +32.3% |
| 6M | +44.4% | -33.7% | +78.1% | +53.2% |
| YTD | +52.3% | -41.3% | +93.6% | +64.1% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | -58.8% | +89.2% | +51.2% |
| 3Y | +313.3% | -57.5% | +370.7% | +360.0% |
| All | +313.3% | -57.1% | +370.3% | +360.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling