+140.1%
ANET vs BIYA
-99.8%
+239.9%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIYA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.6% | -2.2% | +7.8% | +5.6% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -1.8% | +4.8% | +3.0% |
| 30D | -5.2% | -17.5% | +12.3% | -5.2% |
| 3M | +27.6% | -78.0% | +105.6% | +27.1% |
| 6M | +44.4% | -89.5% | +133.9% | +44.5% |
| YTD | +52.3% | -94.3% | +146.6% | +52.3% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | -98.6% | +129.0% | +34.1% |
| All | +140.1% | -99.8% | +239.9% | +151.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIYA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIYA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIYA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIYA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling