+313.3%
ANET vs ARES
+35.4%
+277.9%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARES | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.6% | +0.8% | +4.8% | +5.2% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -6.1% | +9.1% | +6.2% |
| 30D | -5.2% | -7.5% | +2.3% | -1.7% |
| 3M | +27.6% | +0.1% | +27.5% | +26.5% |
| 6M | +44.4% | +30.3% | +14.1% | +23.1% |
| YTD | +52.3% | -16.6% | +68.9% | +63.4% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | -26.1% | +56.5% | +50.4% |
| 3Y | +313.3% | +36.4% | +276.8% | +267.9% |
| All | +313.3% | +35.4% | +277.9% | +267.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARES.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARES return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARES return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARES wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling