+275.3%
ANET vs AMT
+16.9%
+258.4%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | +1.0% | -5.5% | -4.2% |
| 7D | +15.5% | +1.5% | +14.0% | +16.1% |
| 30D | +1.0% | +6.8% | -5.9% | +3.4% |
| 3M | -3.1% | +11.2% | -14.3% | +0.3% |
| 6M | +40.2% | +12.5% | +27.8% | +47.1% |
| YTD | +50.6% | +12.5% | +38.1% | +58.7% |
| 1Y | +51.4% | +10.1% | +41.3% | +58.6% |
| 3Y | +275.3% | +16.0% | +259.3% | +281.0% |
| All | +275.3% | +16.9% | +258.4% | +281.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling