+187.5%
ANET vs AMIX
-99.9%
+287.4%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | AMIX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | -1.9% | +3.1% | +1.2% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -13.7% | +12.9% | -0.7% |
| 30D | -1.8% | -62.1% | +60.3% | -1.3% |
| 3M | +16.7% | -46.2% | +62.9% | +15.8% |
| 6M | +43.7% | -46.4% | +90.2% | +42.5% |
| YTD | +47.9% | -60.3% | +108.1% | +46.9% |
| 1Y | +37.3% | -79.7% | +116.9% | +37.2% |
| All | +187.5% | -99.9% | +287.4% | +224.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMIX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMIX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMIX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMIX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling