+299.5%
ANET vs ALHC
+151.5%
+147.9%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -3.2% | +2.2% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +3.7% | -4.1% | +7.8% | +3.8% |
| 30D | +0.7% | -5.4% | +6.2% | +0.9% |
| 3M | +26.8% | -32.1% | +58.9% | +27.4% |
| 6M | +40.7% | -28.5% | +69.1% | +40.8% |
| YTD | +47.2% | -34.0% | +81.3% | +48.0% |
| 1Y | +36.0% | -20.9% | +56.9% | +35.5% |
| All | +299.5% | +151.5% | +147.9% | +294.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling