+299.5%
ANET vs ACWI
+75.1%
+224.3%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACWI | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -0.6% | -0.4% | +0.1% |
| 7D | +3.7% | 0.0% | +3.7% | +3.7% |
| 30D | +0.7% | -0.6% | +1.3% | +1.9% |
| 3M | +26.8% | +4.3% | +22.5% | +18.1% |
| 6M | +40.7% | +12.7% | +28.0% | +12.7% |
| YTD | +47.2% | +13.9% | +33.3% | +16.0% |
| 1Y | +36.0% | +20.5% | +15.4% | -3.4% |
| All | +299.5% | +75.1% | +224.3% | +60.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACWI.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACWI return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACWI return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACWI wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling