+38.3%
AMZZ vs VOO
+54.1%
-15.9%
-55.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -0.4% | +0.1% | +0.8% |
| 7D | -6.2% | +0.1% | -6.3% | -6.4% |
| 30D | -11.3% | +0.1% | -11.4% | -11.5% |
| 3M | -2.6% | +2.0% | -4.6% | -7.0% |
| 6M | +28.3% | +13.0% | +15.3% | -7.1% |
| YTD | +9.8% | +13.6% | -3.8% | -21.4% |
| 1Y | -0.3% | +20.1% | -20.3% | -37.9% |
| All | +38.3% | +54.1% | -15.9% | -50.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling