+76.0%
AMZN vs TNA
+99.7%
-23.7%
-30.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TNA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -3.0% | +2.8% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -2.7% | -7.6% | +4.9% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -7.5% | -13.6% | +6.1% | -4.3% |
| 3M | +5.8% | +2.8% | +3.0% | +4.4% |
| 6M | +17.5% | +34.5% | -17.0% | +7.7% |
| YTD | +9.1% | +41.0% | -31.9% | -2.0% |
| 1Y | +9.4% | +52.0% | -42.7% | -4.6% |
| All | +76.0% | +99.7% | -23.7% | +39.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TNA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TNA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TNA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TNA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling