+86.7%
AMZN vs NTAP
+150.8%
-64.1%
-30.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | +4.1% | -5.8% | -2.7% |
| 7D | +0.1% | -2.4% | +2.5% | +0.5% |
| 30D | +2.6% | -23.4% | +26.0% | +9.2% |
| 3M | -2.2% | -7.5% | +5.3% | -1.1% |
| 6M | -1.0% | +56.4% | -57.4% | -15.2% |
| YTD | +15.3% | +73.6% | -58.3% | -5.4% |
| 1Y | +6.9% | +68.4% | -61.5% | -11.4% |
| All | +86.7% | +150.8% | -64.1% | +44.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling