+87.0%
AMZN vs NIO
-60.1%
+147.1%
-30.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -4.9% | +4.6% | +0.2% |
| 7D | +2.8% | -14.5% | +17.3% | +4.4% |
| 30D | +5.0% | -15.0% | +19.9% | +6.6% |
| 3M | +0.6% | -35.6% | +36.1% | +4.7% |
| 6M | -1.3% | -55.7% | +54.4% | +6.1% |
| YTD | +15.5% | -43.1% | +58.7% | +20.9% |
| 1Y | +12.2% | -53.5% | +65.8% | +19.6% |
| 3Y | +87.0% | -59.8% | +146.8% | +93.4% |
| All | +87.0% | -60.1% | +147.1% | +93.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling