+35.9%
AMZN vs NBIS
+1,606.6%
-1,570.7%
-30.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NBIS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +7.7% | -8.3% | -1.2% |
| 7D | +0.8% | +22.2% | -21.4% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -6.4% | +29.7% | -36.1% | -9.2% |
| 3M | +4.8% | +11.9% | -7.1% | +1.5% |
| 6M | +20.5% | +173.0% | -152.5% | +5.2% |
| YTD | +11.3% | +191.4% | -180.0% | -4.3% |
| 1Y | +9.0% | +280.7% | -271.7% | -10.9% |
| All | +35.9% | +1,606.6% | -1,570.7% | -4.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NBIS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NBIS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NBIS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NBIS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling