+85.9%
AMZN vs LCID
-92.3%
+178.2%
-30.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -1.1% | +0.5% | -0.5% |
| 7D | +0.8% | +1.8% | -1.0% | +0.7% |
| 30D | -6.4% | -34.2% | +27.9% | -4.1% |
| 3M | +4.8% | -9.1% | +13.9% | +3.9% |
| 6M | +20.5% | -52.6% | +73.1% | +23.8% |
| YTD | +11.3% | -56.2% | +67.5% | +14.6% |
| 1Y | +9.0% | -74.9% | +83.9% | +15.6% |
| 3Y | +85.9% | -92.1% | +178.0% | +110.8% |
| All | +85.9% | -92.3% | +178.2% | +110.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling