+8.1%
AMT vs SPYG
+98.4%
-90.3%
-28.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SPYG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -0.4% | +0.2% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +1.5% | +0.3% | +1.1% | +1.5% |
| 30D | +3.7% | -1.7% | +5.4% | +3.5% |
| 3M | -7.2% | +3.6% | -10.8% | -6.6% |
| 6M | -4.2% | +16.6% | -20.8% | -2.8% |
| YTD | +1.9% | +13.4% | -11.5% | +3.1% |
| 1Y | -6.4% | +19.6% | -26.0% | -4.9% |
| All | +8.1% | +98.4% | -90.3% | -2.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SPYG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SPYG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SPYG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SPYG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling