-7.8%
AMT vs NXT
+178.8%
-186.6%
-28.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | +1.2% | -2.3% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -0.2% | -1.1% | +0.9% | -0.2% |
| 30D | +4.6% | -15.3% | +20.0% | +4.9% |
| 3M | -8.4% | -43.8% | +35.3% | -7.3% |
| 6M | -6.0% | -18.7% | +12.6% | -6.4% |
| YTD | +2.1% | -3.0% | +5.1% | +0.6% |
| 1Y | -6.4% | +22.7% | -29.1% | -9.0% |
| 3Y | +8.1% | +95.9% | -87.9% | -1.6% |
| All | -7.8% | +178.8% | -186.6% | -18.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling