-20.3%
AMT vs MSTZ
-99.2%
+78.9%
-27.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | +5.5% | -5.6% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +1.5% | -23.6% | +25.0% | +1.5% |
| 30D | +3.7% | -60.7% | +64.5% | +4.0% |
| 3M | -7.2% | -58.3% | +51.1% | -7.0% |
| 6M | -4.2% | -60.0% | +55.9% | -4.0% |
| YTD | +1.9% | -75.2% | +77.1% | +2.0% |
| 1Y | -6.4% | -19.9% | +13.5% | -7.8% |
| All | -20.3% | -99.2% | +78.9% | -11.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling