+16.0%
AMT vs MCO
+51.9%
-35.9%
-28.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MCO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.0% | +0.3% | +0.7% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +1.5% | +0.5% | +1.0% | +1.4% |
| 30D | +6.8% | +9.8% | -3.0% | +4.3% |
| 3M | +11.2% | +4.3% | +6.9% | +10.0% |
| 6M | +12.5% | +16.5% | -4.0% | +8.2% |
| YTD | +12.5% | +0.1% | +12.4% | +12.1% |
| 1Y | +10.1% | +4.4% | +5.7% | +8.3% |
| 3Y | +16.0% | +51.6% | -35.6% | -10.0% |
| All | +16.0% | +51.9% | -35.9% | -10.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MCO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MCO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MCO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MCO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling