-3.9%
AMT vs KRMN
+14.6%
-18.5%
-27.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -2.4% | +1.0% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -2.7% | -15.1% | +12.4% | -2.7% |
| 30D | +2.0% | -44.5% | +46.5% | +1.9% |
| 3M | -9.3% | -25.0% | +15.7% | -9.5% |
| 6M | -5.2% | -66.5% | +61.3% | -4.5% |
| YTD | +0.5% | -53.0% | +53.5% | +0.1% |
| 1Y | -7.3% | -44.7% | +37.5% | -8.7% |
| All | -3.9% | +14.6% | -18.5% | -11.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling