-14.7%
AMRZ vs TXG
+487.2%
-501.8%
-34.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | TXG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -0.9% | +0.5% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -1.9% | +1.8% | -3.7% | -2.1% |
| 30D | -16.9% | +32.0% | -48.9% | -19.6% |
| 3M | -19.2% | +87.0% | -106.2% | -25.7% |
| 6M | -29.3% | +180.1% | -209.3% | -38.0% |
| YTD | -18.0% | +284.1% | -302.1% | -29.7% |
| 1Y | -15.1% | +361.7% | -376.8% | -28.9% |
| All | -14.7% | +487.2% | -501.8% | -27.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TXG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TXG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TXG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TXG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling