-16.6%
AMRZ vs NIO
-55.0%
+38.4%
-44.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -4.9% | +5.1% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -2.1% | -14.5% | +12.4% | -0.9% |
| 30D | +13.0% | -15.0% | +27.9% | +14.4% |
| 3M | -12.1% | -35.6% | +23.5% | -9.3% |
| 6M | -19.1% | -55.7% | +36.5% | -13.7% |
| YTD | -23.3% | -43.1% | +19.9% | -21.5% |
| 1Y | -16.6% | -53.5% | +36.9% | -12.8% |
| All | -16.6% | -55.0% | +38.4% | -12.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling