-14.7%
AMRZ vs EPAM
-28.3%
+13.7%
-34.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -2.4% | +1.9% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -1.9% | +2.0% | -3.9% | -2.1% |
| 30D | -16.9% | +6.5% | -23.5% | -17.3% |
| 3M | -19.2% | +19.9% | -39.1% | -20.2% |
| 6M | -29.3% | -16.9% | -12.3% | -27.6% |
| YTD | -18.0% | -42.9% | +24.9% | -13.0% |
| 1Y | -15.1% | -30.4% | +15.3% | -13.5% |
| All | -14.7% | -28.3% | +13.7% | -12.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling