-14.7%
AMRZ vs ABCL
+241.2%
-255.9%
-34.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -1.2% | +0.8% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -1.9% | +0.7% | -2.6% | -1.9% |
| 30D | -16.9% | +93.1% | -110.0% | -21.3% |
| 3M | -19.2% | +79.4% | -98.6% | -23.4% |
| 6M | -29.3% | +214.9% | -244.2% | -37.0% |
| YTD | -18.0% | +234.2% | -252.2% | -27.7% |
| 1Y | -15.1% | +174.8% | -189.8% | -24.0% |
| All | -14.7% | +241.2% | -255.9% | -24.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling