+133.2%
AMKR vs NIO
-62.3%
+195.5%
-65.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | -0.3% | +6.4% | +6.2% |
| 7D | +11.1% | -6.7% | +17.8% | +12.4% |
| 30D | -8.1% | -20.0% | +12.0% | -4.5% |
| 3M | -25.6% | -30.5% | +4.9% | -20.9% |
| 6M | +22.5% | -20.7% | +43.2% | +26.9% |
| YTD | +29.1% | -25.7% | +54.8% | +34.8% |
| 1Y | +105.7% | -38.6% | +144.3% | +121.0% |
| 3Y | +133.2% | -62.3% | +195.5% | +145.3% |
| All | +133.2% | -62.3% | +195.5% | +145.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling