+91.1%
AMKR vs LNT
+31.4%
+59.7%
-65.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.4% | 0.0% | +4.4% | +4.4% |
| 7D | +8.3% | -1.0% | +9.3% | +8.3% |
| 30D | -6.8% | -4.2% | -2.5% | -6.6% |
| 3M | -31.9% | -6.7% | -25.3% | -32.0% |
| 6M | +18.4% | -3.6% | +21.9% | +17.8% |
| YTD | +31.7% | +5.9% | +25.8% | +29.5% |
| 1Y | +105.2% | +7.3% | +98.0% | +101.0% |
| 3Y | +147.7% | +46.5% | +101.3% | +124.9% |
| All | +91.1% | +31.4% | +59.7% | +79.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling