+63.9%
AMKR vs LCID
-91.4%
+155.2%
-67.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | -11.3% | +8.7% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +21.7% | +9.2% | +12.5% | +20.1% |
| 30D | -22.0% | -3.0% | -19.1% | -22.0% |
| 3M | -33.1% | -50.2% | +17.1% | -27.1% |
| 6M | -49.3% | -45.8% | -3.5% | -47.1% |
| YTD | -5.5% | -69.2% | +63.7% | +7.8% |
| 1Y | +8.4% | -80.4% | +88.8% | +32.0% |
| All | +63.9% | -91.4% | +155.2% | +126.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling