-99.9%
AMIX vs NTNX
+9.3%
-109.2%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTNX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -0.8% | +1.9% | +1.1% |
| 7D | -9.9% | +3.4% | -13.3% | -9.8% |
| 30D | -52.8% | -13.6% | -39.2% | -53.0% |
| 3M | -80.0% | -11.1% | -68.9% | -80.1% |
| 6M | -80.2% | +35.7% | -115.9% | -79.5% |
| YTD | -88.1% | +16.8% | -105.0% | -88.0% |
| 1Y | -91.1% | -9.1% | -81.9% | -91.2% |
| All | -99.9% | +9.3% | -109.2% | -99.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTNX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTNX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTNX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTNX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling