-99.8%
AMIX vs NBIX
+9.0%
-108.8%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NBIX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -0.3% | +0.1% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -3.4% | -1.0% | -2.3% | -3.3% |
| 30D | -54.4% | -5.1% | -49.3% | -54.3% |
| 3M | -45.7% | -4.9% | -40.8% | -45.8% |
| 6M | -49.2% | +21.1% | -70.2% | -49.8% |
| YTD | -60.3% | +9.4% | -69.7% | -60.8% |
| 1Y | -81.4% | +7.9% | -89.2% | -81.5% |
| All | -99.8% | +9.0% | -108.8% | -99.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NBIX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NBIX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NBIX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NBIX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling