-99.8%
AMIX vs LPLA
+50.4%
-150.2%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LPLA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | -0.3% | -1.6% | -1.9% |
| 7D | -13.7% | -3.1% | -10.7% | -13.7% |
| 30D | -62.1% | -0.1% | -62.0% | -62.1% |
| 3M | -46.2% | +23.2% | -69.4% | -49.7% |
| 6M | -46.4% | +15.5% | -62.0% | -49.4% |
| YTD | -60.3% | +0.9% | -61.1% | -61.0% |
| 1Y | -79.7% | +0.2% | -79.8% | -80.2% |
| All | -99.8% | +50.4% | -150.2% | -99.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LPLA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LPLA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LPLA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LPLA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling